🎬Advertisement[movie-top-mobile]
Movie Review

Yellow Eyes (2026) Review: Korman's Haunting Vision

MovieBuzz Desk·5 min read
4.0/10Rating

Director

Jesse Korman

Language

EN

Release

2026-08-18

Runtime

86 min

Quick Verdict

“Yellow Eyes” is a competent but derivative haunted-house horror that banks on atmosphere over innovation. It has a few genuinely unsettling images and a committed lead performance from Nena Martins, but a muddled script and a generic third act dilute the dread. For die-hard genre fans, there’s a modest thrill to be found; for everyone else, it’s a watchable but forgettable rental best saved for a rainy night.

Story

The premise is classic bait: Julia (Nena Martins) and Brad (Michael Kunicki), a young couple on the verge of a new chapter, inherit an old family home. The house, predictably, comes with baggage - specifically, a mysterious relic tucked away in the basement. That relic, of course, hosts the spirit of a powerful demon, and it doesn’t take long for the malevolent entity to sink its claws into Brad. What follows is Julia’s desperate scramble to find an exorcist before her husband is lost entirely.

Korman’s screenplay doesn’t waste time on subverting expectations. The beats arrive like clockwork: the unsettling discovery, the strange noises at night, Brad’s gradual transformation from loving husband to glassy-eyed vessel. The narrative finds its footing only when Julia (Martins) takes center stage, dragging a skeptical local priest-turned-exorcist (Brian Rooney as Abbott Penrose) back to the house. The film’s best scenes are between the two of them, as Julia’s desperation clashes with the cleric’s measured doubt.

Review

Where “Yellow Eyes” succeeds is in its tactile, grimy aesthetic. Korman shoots the house with a claustrophobic eye, favoring cramped hallways and pitch-black corners that feel genuinely oppressive. The titular yellow eyes - practical effects, thank goodness - are sparingly used, and when they do appear, they carry an uncanny weight that CG rarely achieves. The sound design is equally sharp, layering whispers and low-frequency hums beneath the dialogue to keep the viewer on edge.

But the script is the demon in the room. The first half drags, stuck in a loop of spooky ambiance without meaningful character development. Brad, played by a game but underused Kunicki, is mostly a prop for the possession; his demonic turn is more snarl than substance. The film’s middle act introduces William Derrick III as “The Doctor,” a performance that borders on self-parody, and Margo O’Donnell’s Lana (a medium, naturally) feels like she wandered in from a different, campier movie.

The dialogue oscillates between functional and stilted. There’s a moment where Julia, at her wit’s end, tells the priest, “You have to believe me - I saw it with my own eyes,” which lands with a thud because we’ve already seen it with ours. Korman trusts the audience too little, explaining lore through clunky exposition rather than letting the imagery speak. The exorcism sequence, when it finally arrives, is a cacophony of Latin-adjacent chanting (all rendered in English here, of course) and furniture tossing, but it lacks the visceral invention of better films in the subgenre.

The film’s brevity is both a blessing and a curse. At 86 minutes, it never overstays its welcome, but the brevity comes at the cost of a coherent mythology. The relic’s origin is sketched in a single line; the demon’s motivations are vague; and the final showdown resolves with a cheap irony that feels unearned. It’s a shame, because Martins is a revelation. She carries the emotional weight with raw, red-eyed realism, transforming Julia’s terror into something you can almost feel. Her chemistry with Rooney is the quiet engine that keeps the film from collapsing into parody.

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Nena Martins delivers a visceral, emotionally grounded lead performance.
  • The practical effects for the demon eyes are genuinely unsettling.
  • A tight runtime that doesn’t drag, even during slower stretches.
  • Strong sound design and claustrophobic cinematography build real tension.

Cons

  • Generic possession narrative with zero originality.
  • Underdeveloped supporting characters, especially Brad’s possessed state.
  • Clunky, exposition-heavy dialogue in key scenes.
  • The rushed third act undermines the buildup with an unsatisfying resolution.

Rating Breakdown

Story4.0/10
Acting6.0/10
Direction6.0/10
Horror Elements6.0/10
Cinematography & Sound7.0/10
Entertainment Value5.0/10

Final Verdict

“Yellow Eyes” wants to be a modern classic of demonic possession, but it settles for being a glossy imitation. Jesse Korman has an eye for dread and a sharp ear for ambient fear, yet he’s shackled to a script that refuses to take risks. The result is a film that’s competent, occasionally creepy, and almost entirely conventional. Nena Martins deserves a better vehicle; her performance here is the sole reason to stick around. If you’ve seen one haunted relic movie, you’ve seen “Yellow Eyes.” It’s not a bad way to spend 86 minutes - but you’ll likely forget those eyes the moment the credits roll. As of now, the TMDb audience score of 4/10 feels about right: honest, if a touch harsh. There’s a spark of talent buried in this house, but it’s buried deep.

🎬Advertisement[movie-in-content]

Cast

N

Nena Martins

Julia

M

Michael Kunicki

Brad

J

Jimmy Chung

Ronnie

W

William Derrick III

The Doctor

M

Margo O’Donnell

Lana

B

Brian Rooney

Abbott Penrose

Joette Waters

Joette Waters

Gretchen

Gallery

Yellow Eyes (2026) Review: Korman's Haunting Vision still 1
Yellow Eyes (2026) Review: Korman's Haunting Vision still 2
Yellow Eyes (2026) Review: Korman's Haunting Vision still 3
Yellow Eyes (2026) Review: Korman's Haunting Vision still 4
Yellow Eyes (2026) Review: Korman's Haunting Vision still 5
Yellow Eyes (2026) Review: Korman's Haunting Vision still 6

Similar Movies

#Review#Movies#Entertainment#2026
🎬Advertisement[movie-bottom-mobile]